This short article identifies the introduction of the relationship Intimacy Directory (RCI), and therefore draws towards conceptualization away from closeness as high interdependence ranging from a couple people’s activities recommended by Kelley et al. (1983). The modern “closest” relationships of individuals (N = 241) drawn throughout the student populace served since the reason for RCI innovation, towards closest relationships receive in order to include multiple matchmaking types, also personal, friend, and you may family dating. The organization and you can psychometric features of one’s about three RCI chodit s nÄ›kým swipe subscales (Regularity, Diversity, Strength), their rating, and their integration to make a complete index from intimacy is described. The latest RCI’s try-retest precision is actually stated and also the organization anywhere between RCI get and you can the newest life of the relationship try discussed. RCI ratings for individuals’ nearest dating was contrasted to people of not-intimate dating, to a subjective intimacy list, also to multiple methods of matchmaking apply to, also Rubin’s (1973) Taste and you may Loving scales. Ultimately, the ability of new RCI so you’re able to expect relationships breakup was compared to that of your Personal Closeness Index, a directory of your mental tone of one’s dating, and dating resilience. It’s concluded that the fresh new RCI possesses acceptable internal and you will take to-retest precision, satisfactory discriminant and build validity, and you can encouraging predictive authenticity, for this reason recommending it constitutes a feasible manner of examining relationship closeness.
Fingerprint
- Devices and you will Offers Medication Existence Sciences 100%
Cite that it
- APA
- Practical
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Copywriter
- BIBTEX
- RIS
N2 – This informative article makes reference to the introduction of the relationship Closeness Collection (RCI), hence pulls towards conceptualization regarding closeness because higher interdependence between two mans situations advised because of the Kelley mais aussi al. (1983). The present day “closest” relationships men and women (Letter = 241) pulled on pupil population offered because the reason behind RCI innovation, towards the nearest dating receive so you’re able to cover several matchmaking systems, along with intimate, buddy, and you can nearest and dearest dating. The organization and you can psychometric properties of your own three RCI subscales (Volume, Range, Strength), their rating, in addition to their consolidation in order to create a total list regarding closeness is actually described. The latest RCI’s sample-retest accuracy is advertised therefore the association anywhere between RCI rating and you will the newest longevity of the relationship is actually discussed. RCI ratings to own individuals’ closest relationship is actually contrasted to people away from not-personal relationship, so you can a personal closeness index, also to multiple tips off relationship connect with, in addition to Rubin’s (1973) Taste and you may Enjoying balances. In the end, the skill of the newest RCI so you can anticipate dating breakup was in comparison to that particular of Personal Intimacy Index, a collection of your emotional build of your own relationships, and to relationship durability. It’s concluded that new RCI features appropriate interior and you can take to-retest accuracy, sufficient discriminant and build validity, and you will promising predictive legitimacy, thus suggesting this comprises a viable a style of examining relationship intimacy.
Abdominal – This post means the development of the relationship Closeness Index (RCI), which pulls into the conceptualization out of closeness because high interdependence between two mans facts proposed by the Kelley et al. (1983). The modern “closest” relationship of men and women (Letter = 241) pulled regarding the college student populace served while the basis for RCI creativity, with the nearest matchmaking found in order to involve multiple matchmaking systems, including romantic, friend, and you will family dating. The development and you will psychometric properties of one’s around three RCI subscales (Frequency, Diversity, Strength), their scoring, in addition to their integration to form an overall total index regarding closeness is actually discussed. The new RCI’s decide to try-retest reliability are claimed while the connection between RCI rating and you can the latest lifetime of the partnership try talked about. RCI scores to possess individuals’ closest dating was contrasted to the people of not-romantic relationships, in order to a subjective closeness directory, and multiple methods of relationship affect, in addition to Rubin’s (1973) Preference and you may Enjoying bills. In the end, the ability of new RCI so you’re able to assume matchmaking separation was compared to that of the Personal Closeness List, a collection of one’s emotional build of your relationship, and also to matchmaking longevity. It is determined that new RCI features appropriate internal and you may decide to try-retest reliability, sufficient discriminant and create legitimacy, and encouraging predictive authenticity, hence recommending that it constitutes a practical a style of assessing relationship intimacy.